Naval Ravikant

Write a cold email in the Naval Ravikant tonality.

Context:
- Prospect: [NAME], [TITLE] at [COMPANY]
- Signal: [What triggered this outreach - funding, hire, product launch, etc.]
- My product: [What you sell]
- Key differentiator: [Why you're superior to alternatives]

Naval Ravikant Style Rules:
- Strip away everything non-essential. Each sentence should be complete on its own.
- Think in first principles—what's the root truth here?
- Use leverage language: what compounds? What scales without you?
- Avoid status games. Don't name-drop or flex.
- Aphoristic where possible—wisdom compressed into a line.
- Be specific about mechanisms, not just outcomes.
- No corporate speak. Write like you're thinking out loud.
- Make them see something they couldn't see before.
- Under 80 words. Density over length.

Tone: Calm, clear, slightly detached. Like talking to someone who's already figured it out.

Generate Naval Ravikant-style discovery questions.

Context:
- Prospect company: [COMPANY]
- Their likely problem: [PROBLEM AREA]
- My solution: [WHAT YOU OFFER]

Naval Ravikant Approach to Discovery:
- Go to the root. Don't ask about symptoms.
- Challenge conventional wisdom gently.
- Look for leverage points—where does small input create large output?
- Identify what compounds over time vs. what's linear.
- Find the specific knowledge they've built (unique insight).
- Understand what game they're actually playing.

Generate 5 questions that:
1. Reveal the first principles of their business (not the surface metrics)
2. Expose where they're trading time for money instead of building leverage
3. Uncover what they know that competitors don't (specific knowledge)
4. Identify what would compound if they solved this problem
5. Challenge an assumption they haven't questioned

Handle this objection in the Naval Ravikant tonality.

The objection: [PASTE OBJECTION HERE]

Context:
- My product: [WHAT YOU SELL]
- Why we're better: [KEY DIFFERENTIATOR]

Naval Ravikant Response Framework:
- Don't argue. Reframe at a deeper level.
- Go to first principles—why does this objection exist?
- Use leverage thinking—show the compounding effect of solving vs. not solving.
- Stay calm. Detachment signals confidence.
- Offer a mental model, not a rebuttal.
- Make them see the objection differently, not just overcome it.
- If the objection is valid, acknowledge it clearly.

Generate a response that elevates the conversation, not wins the argument.

Write a LinkedIn message in the Naval Ravikant tonality.

Context:
- Recipient: [NAME], [TITLE]
- Connection point: [How you're connected or what triggered this]
- What I want: [Meeting, intro, feedback, etc.]

Naval Ravikant LinkedIn Rules:
- One clear idea. No padding.
- Share an insight that shifts their thinking.
- Avoid social scripts ("Hope you're well").
- Be specific about the value—what lever moves what outcome.
- No status signaling. Let the idea speak.
- Make the ask clear but low-pressure.
- Under 50 words. Compress the wisdom.

Tone: Thoughtful, calm, clear. Like a note from someone who values your time because they value their own.

Create a Naval Ravikant-style reframing for this problem.

Context:
- The conventional view: [How most people see this problem]
- The prospect's current approach: [What they're doing now]
- What I want them to see: [The insight I want to convey]

Naval Ravikant Reframing Approach:
- Start from first principles. What's actually true here?
- Identify the hidden assumption everyone accepts.
- Flip it. Show the opposite might be true.
- Use leverage thinking—where's the 80/20?
- Make it aphoristic—compressible into a single sentence.
- Don't argue the old view. Make the new view obvious.

Generate:
1. The first-principles reframe (1-2 sentences)
2. The hidden assumption exposed
3. The new mental model
4. An aphorism that captures it